Looking for a specific AI? Request it now and someone may build it!

Claude 3 or Chat GPT: Which is Better?

Ever since ChatGPT came to the market, many more AI chatbots have started becoming a competition. Claude is one of the most notable ones. Both tools work as language engines instead of search engines. This means that their job isn't just to retrieve relevant information related to what you're looking for, like Google, but to provide to-the-point data by analyzing large amounts of information.

Despite the similarities, Claude 3 as a model has certain features and qualities that ChatGPT doesn't. Which raises the question: which one is better? In this article, we will compare the two revolutionary tools to answer that question for you.

Table of Contents

What is ChatGPT?

ChatGPT, which stands for Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer, is an Open-source chatbot developed by OpenAI. The chatbot was programmed based on the LLM or Large Language Model and utilizes the Natural Language Processing (NLP) technology. It was first launched on November 30, 2022, and since then, it has taken the world by storm.

ChatGPT is capable of answering questions and queries of every kind in whatever way the user prefers, ensuring seamless and intuitive conversations between humans and artificial intelligence. The foundation of the tool has been built upon neural network architecture and deep learning. This network architecture is capable of picking up long-range dependencies in sequential data to leverage transformers. As a result, ChatGPT is capable of processing the minute nuances of human language and responding accordingly. 

ChatGPT is equipped with knowledge on a diverse range of topics. Due to its intuitive decision-making ability, it can understand, generate, and respond to natural human language in a manner that is contextually appropriate and relevant. Not only that, its responses are remarkably human-like. It can even adapt the tone of a specific character in its responses if given the command.

What is Claude 3?

Claude 3 is the latest generation of AI models under the Claude family. Claude is marketed as a foundational AI model equipped with advanced reasoning, visual analysis, code generation, and multilingual processing skills. It was first developed by Anthropic in March 2023 with the intention of competing against ChatGPT. A year later, in March 2024, Claude 3 was introduced to the world. 

It’s interesting to note that Anthropic was originally made by senior team members of OpenAI. Later on, they broke away from OpenAI due to disagreeing with their decision to work closely with Microsoft. Now, Anthropic has created Claude 3, a tool that has a high potential to replace ChatGPT completely. 

At its core, Claude is capable of carrying out the same functions as ChatGPT. It can answer questions, make decisions, generate codes, write poems, simplify complex concepts, create step-by-step guides on how to do something, do mathematical calculations, and even play word games. It can also carry out some of ChatGPT’s advanced features, like processing images, converting handwritten text to digital text, and transcribing audio.

As Claude’s official website says, “If you can dream it, Claude can help you do it.” Claude has been trained using Constitutional AI to ensure maximum safety and accuracy. You can access the free version of Claude 3, known as Claude 3 Sonnet, simply by making an account there. Sonnet is said to be the second-most intelligent AI model by Claude. The 1st one, Claud 3 Opus, must be accessed by subscribing to the Claude Pro plan. There is also Claude 3 Haiku, who is lower in intelligence than both Sonnet and Opus.

Compare the features of Chat GPT And Claude – Pros and Cons

Math problem-solving 

A key aspect where Claude 3 models and ChatGPT are being compared is their ability to solve mathematical problems. Both models are capable of carrying out basic mathematical calculations. 


According to the data from the multimodal benchmark tests, Claude 3 Opus shows a 60.1% accuracy in math problem-solving under the MATH benchmark, in comparison to 52.4% BY GPT-4, the latest from OpenAI. If we compare the free versions, Claude 3 Sonnet and Claude 3 Haiku both have higher percentages of success–43.1% and 38.9%, respectively–compared to GPT-3.5.


When it comes to multilingual math, Claude Opus shows a surprising 90.7% success rate, compared to 74.5% by GPT-4. The latter percentage is also lower than both Sonnet and Haiku. Meanwhile, GPT-3.5 is not capable of multilingual math. This test was done with the MGSM or Multilingual Grade School Math benchmark dataset. 


A GSM8K or Grade School Math benchmark showed 95% for Claude 3 and 92% for GPT-4. However, GPT-4 Turbo showed a score of 95.3% in this test, so it outperforms Claude 3 Opus.

It’s worth mentioning that Claude’s testing was all zero-shot, as it was prompted based on generalized reasoning patterns. Whereas GPT’s testing was all at least 4-shot, prompted with examples. So, Claude can be considered more intelligent in terms of its ability to generalize and transfer knowledge without concrete training examples. At the same time, GPT can be considered more intelligent in terms of its ability to learn quickly from a small number of examples.

It’s also worth mentioning that most of the benchmark data does not show a comparison with the GPT Turbo model because the data for the latter hasn’t been made widely available. However, many believe that Turbo outperforms Claude 3 in many aspects. 

Number of Token Inputs

Both GPT and Claude have an output token input of 4096 tokens. But what about input? Claude 3 again takes the crown here because, in all three models, you start with an input token limit of 200K, whereas for GPT-4, it is 128K. 

Moreover, 200K isn’t the absolute limit for Claude 3. Rather, it is only the limit up to which it can generate a near-instant response. It can actually receive up to 1 million tokens. So, when working with large-scale data, Claude 3 will prove to be more helpful than GPT 4.

Claude 3 models are also faster at generating responses to larger scales of data compared to GPT. Haiku is the fastest, but it only helps with simpler, daily tasks, whereas Sonnet is slightly slower but faster than Claude 2 and can help with more complex tasks. Opus can handle extremely complex tasks with the same speed as Claude 2. When it comes to moderately simple tasks, Claude 3 Opus shows higher speed than GPT-4 in the same task.

Handwriting to Text

Both GPT-4 and Claude 3 are capable of converting handwritten scribbles to digital texts with surprising accuracy. However, users who have compared both, especially with messy and barely intelligible handwriting, have claimed that GPT-4 shows a better performance in terms of speed and accuracy compared to Claude.  

Image Processing and Generation 

Both Claude 3 and GPT-4 have the ability to process and analyze images. However, GPT-3.5, the free version of ChatGPT, does not take images as input for reading unless an external plug-in is applied, whereas Claude 3 Sonnet has the built-in ability to do it. The accuracy of reading in Sonnet is lower than in Opus and GPT-4. 

Comparing the benchmark data, the ANLS scores of Claude 3 Sonnet and Claude 3 Opus are 89.5% and 89.3%, respectively, whereas GPT-4V shows a score of 88.4%.

When it comes to scientific diagrams, in the AI2D test, Sonnet scored 88.7%, while GPT-4V scored 78%. A similar difference is seen in the Relaxed Accuracy test, where Haiku scored 81.7% and GPT-4V scored 78.5%.

As of now, none of the Claude 3 models have image generation ability and can only provide textual outputs. However, the GPT-4V model can generate visual outputs. You can give it textual instructions to generate a certain kind of image, or you can give it an image to reshape and edit, and it can do both. 

 App Availability

At present, Claude does not have any app, but ChatGPT does. Having an app makes it easier to perform on-to-go functions and makes it quicker to access the tool. 

Language Availability

ChatGPT offers more language options than Claude. At present, ChatGPT can conduct input and output in more than 95 languages from around the world. However, Claude 3’s training is still limited to English, Japanese, Spanish, and French. 

Daily Limit

At present, there is a daily limit present for how many messages you can send via Claude. Usually, you can send only 10 messages, as in, ask 10 questions maximum within a 5-hour time-frame. After that time, your limit renews again. However, there is no limit to how many messages you can send via ChatGPT in a day, even in the free version of GPT-3.5. 

Claude 3 vs. ChatGPT: Case Study

Case Study 1: Generating Blog Ideas

PROMPT: Generate a list of blog ideas surrounding the topic of interior decoration. Ensure the ideas are unique, original, creative, and helpful.

Claude 3 Sonnet’s response

Here are some unique, original, creative, and helpful blog ideas surrounding the topic of interior decoration:

  • Embracing Imperfections: The Beauty of Wabi-Sabi in Interior Design
  • Adaptive Reuse: Repurposing Unexpected Objects into Functional Decor
  • Sensory-Friendly Spaces: Creating Environments for Neurodivergent Individuals
  • Mindful Minimalism: Streamlining Your Space for Mental Clarity
  • The Art of Negative Space: Leveraging Emptiness for Visual Impact
  • Chromotherapy: Harnessing the Psychological Effects of Color
  • Ergonomic Aesthetics: Marrying Form and Function for Comfort

ChatGPT-3.5’s response

  • “10 Unconventional Ways to Add Personality to Your Rental Apartment”
  • “Transforming Small Spaces: Tips for Making Every Inch Count”
  • “Sustainable Interior Design: Eco-Friendly Ideas for a Greener Home”
  • “The Power of Color Psychology: Choosing Hues to Enhance Your Mood”
  • “Multi-Functional Furniture: Maximizing Space Without Sacrificing Style”
  • “From Drab to Fab: Budget-Friendly Ways to Refresh Your Home Decor”
  • “Seasonal Switch-Up: Quick and Easy Decor Changes for Every Time of Year”


While both tools generated some similar topics for blogs, the way the titles are phrased shows differences. Claude’s response seems to be more focused on the ‘unique’ keyword of the prompt, whereas ChatGPT takes both ‘unique’ and ‘helpful’ into consideration when phrasing the titles. Claude introduces the new ideas, while ChatGPT tells the potential reader how that new idea will benefit them in the title.

Case study 2: Writing a Poem

PROMPT: Write a poem in exactly 5 sentences about a woman drinking coffee at a diner while it’s raining outside.

Claude 3 Sonnet’s Response

Rain taps against the diner’s window pane,

As she sips her steaming coffee, lost in thought.

The aroma wafts, a comforting refrain,

A moment’s respite from the world she’s sought.

Her refuge is found, and she savors each warm drop.

ChatGPT-3.5’s Response

In the corner booth, she sits alone,

Savoring the warmth of her coffee’s tone.

Raindrops tap on the windowpane’s embrace,

A soothing rhythm in the cozy space.

Lost in thought, she finds solace in the rain’s gentle grace.


While poetry is subjective, it can be noted that Claude 3 does a better job at playing with the theme and maintaining a rhythm compared to ChatGPT.

Who Benefits from Tools like Claude 3 and ChatGPT?

The simple answer is that, if used the right way, anyone and everyone can benefit from tools like Claude and ChatGPT. These chatbots are trained to provide assistance in the most mundane tasks, from deciding what to cook, from the available ingredients in your fridge to more complex tasks, such as writing the code for designing a website. For example:

Research and Academia

While tools like Claude and GPT might not always help in research by generating accurate facts, they do work wonders in analyzing research papers to summarize the key points and generate instructed data from those. They can also facilitate collaborative writing and editing.


The repetitive and labor-intensive tasks related to business can be left in the hands of these tools while employees can focus more on fields that require human involvement. Both Claude and GPT are capable of analyzing large amounts of data, detecting patterns, generating insights, providing solutions, and responding to common customer queries.


These tools can act as personal learning assistants for students and teachers. They can write essays on a wide variety of subjects, find references, generate examples for better understanding, and simplify complex concepts to pave the way for efficient learning.

Personal Productivity

The time-consuming and pesky tasks of daily life have become simpler thanks to AI models. Drafting emails, finding cooking recipes, planning a to-do list, keeping memos, asking for advice on general topics–whatever you want, AI can do it. 

Where can you find apps like Chat GPT and Claude 3?

Artificial Intelligence is making our lives so much easier than before, saving us time to focus on better jobs. So, anyone who needs to take advantage of the pool of technologies currently available at our fingertips is bound to lag behind by a mile. So why not explore more AI tools like ChatGPT and Claude 3?

AITopTools can help you in that regard. This is an AI directory consisting of a library of more than 10,000 AI tools that you can find only a search button away. You can discover the tool you need by browsing through the categories based on functions and then filtering according to your budget. For each tool, you can see the ratings, read user reviews, and discover alternatives to compare with.


It's hard to come up with a concrete answer to which tool is better because there are aspects where one outperforms the other. The ultimate answer to the question is what exactly you need the tool for. If you need it for a business where you have to work with huge amounts of data, Claude 3 is the answer. But if you need it to generate images, ChatGPT might be the way to go. 



Stay Ahead Of The Curve
With Our FREE AI Tools Reports!

Gain access to expert insights, tips, and strategies on how to leverage AI tools effectively for marketing and productivity!

Read by leaders at